[Bug 220860] Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Dec 29 02:38:38 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220860


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request:             |Review Request:
                   |galternatives - Alternatives|galternatives - Alternatives
                   |Configurator                |Configurator
                 CC|                            |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2006-12-28 21:38 EST -------
Please check the packages you created by rpmlint

Very Very quick note:
--------------------------------------
E: galternatives no-binary
E: galternatives non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/main.py 0644
E: galternatives non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/gadebug.py 0644
E: galternatives non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/common.py 0644
E: galternatives non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/__init__.py 0644
E: galternatives non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/alternative.py 0644
E: galternatives-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package
----------------------------------------
* This seems to be a noarch rpm
* Scripts with shebang should have executable permission
  (or, if 0644 permissons are correct, shebangs should be removed)
* .pyo files are not marked as ghosts due to SELinux issues.
* Please check Requires
  - This package should require pam explicitly
  - And "include" line of pam configuration file means that
    requirement of pam is version-specific (pam >= 0.80)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list