[Bug 197552] Review Request: perl-Set-Infinite

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jul 6 04:34:21 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Set-Infinite


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197552


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-07-06 00:25 EST -------
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  License text included in package.
* source files match upstream:
   c9912f4ee6ac2e2291be94a5a2bd11f2  Set-Infinite-0.61.tar.gz
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* rpmlint is silent.
* no debuginfo package (noarch)
* final provides and requires are sane:
   perl(Set::Infinite) = 0.61
   perl(Set::Infinite::Arithmetic)
   perl(Set::Infinite::Basic)
   perl-Set-Infinite = 0.61-1.fc6
  =
   perl >= 0:5.005_03
   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
   perl(Carp)
   perl(Data::Dumper)
   perl(Exporter)
   perl(POSIX)
   perl(Set::Infinite::Arithmetic)
   perl(Time::Local)
   perl(base)
   perl(constant)
   perl(strict)
   perl(vars)
* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* %check is present and all tests pass:
   All tests successful.
   Files=10, Tests=442,  3 wallclock secs ( 3.29 cusr +  0.17 csys =  3.46 CPU)
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list