[Bug 187294] Review Request: gwyddion

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jul 6 15:40:44 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gwyddion


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2006-07-06 11:32 EST -------
Using GPL instead of GNU GPL is a matter of convention.

If there is a mix of GPL and public domain code, the resulting subpackage
is covered by the GPL. However if you want to make clear which part
of the subpackage are under which licence, you can add a file explaining
more precisely the licences of the different parts of that subpackage, and
put it in %docs.

If you can isolate the parts that are public domain in a subpackage, 
then the licence may be public domain for that subpackage.

Licence issues are not technical issues, but they are as important as
technical issues.

As a side note, you can omit the Licence: tag from subpackages
when it is the same than the licence of the main package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list