[Bug 198285] Review Request: python-simplejson - Simple, fast, extensible JSON encoder/decoder for Python
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jul 11 22:59:57 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-simplejson - Simple, fast, extensible JSON encoder/decoder for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198285
tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-07-11 18:51 EST -------
I'm not terribly well-versed in Python, but this looks to violate the guidelines:
Python packages that use setuptools need to add python-setuptools as a
BuildRequires and must either add --single-version-externally-managed to the
line invoking setup.py in %install, or must add a .pth file containing the path
to the egg or egg directory to %{python_sitelib}.
I don't believe either of those are being done. In addition:
E: python-simplejson zero-length
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/simplejson-1.3-py2.4.egg-info/zip-safe
In general the packaging here looks odd. Why is the test suite included in the
installed module, but not called at all by a %check section in the spec? What
about the contents of
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/simplejson-1.3-py2.4.egg-info? Shouldn't this
all be %doc, if it must be installed at all?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list