[Bug 198691] Review Request: steghide - A Steganography Program
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jul 13 19:10:11 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: steghide - A Steganography Program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198691
panemade at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution| |NOTABUG
CC| |panemade at gmail.com
------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-07-13 15:01 EST -------
== Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored ==
Mock build for development i386 is sucessfull with warnings
CvrStgObject.h:40: warning: 'class CvrStgObject' has virtual functions but
non-virtual destructor
MCryptPPTest.cc: In member function 'bool MCryptPPTest::genericTestDecryption()':
MCryptPPTest.cc:47: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
MCryptPPTest.cc: In member function 'bool MCryptPPTest::genericTestEncryption()':
MCryptPPTest.cc:43: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
* MUST Items:
- rpmlint shows no error.
- dist tag is present.
- The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
- The spec file name matching the base package steghide, in the
format steghide.spec.
- This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
- The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
- The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL.
- This package includes License file COPYING.
- This source package includes the text of the license in its own file,and
that file, containing the text of the license for the package is included in %doc.
- The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct (5be490e24807d921045780fd8cc446b3)
- This package successfully compiled and built into binary rpms for i386
architecture.
- This package did not containd any ExcludeArch.
- This package handled locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Not used %{_datadir}/locale/*.
- This package owns all directories that it creates.
- This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
- This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
- This package used macros.
- Document files are included like README.
- Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives.
Also,
* Source URL is present and working.
* BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot:
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
* BuildRequires is correct
* Package is working fine on i386.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list