[Bug 196401] Review Request: mozldap

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mozldap
Alias: mozldap

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196401





------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com  2006-07-17 13:57 EST -------
> 10) standard practice in Fedora is to symlink back to the actual .so rather
> than create a trail of symlinks

I'm not sure what this means?

> 14) unversioned .so files must go in -devel package when there are
> also versioned .so's

But then if someone links an app against libldap50.so (in the devel package),
how does the app find libldap50.so at runtime when it doesn't exist on the
system, only libldap50.so.5.17?

> 15) rpmlint complains about invalid sonames, I presume this is a side-effect
> of renaming them:

> E: mozldap invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libssldap-5.0.so.5.17 libssldap50.so
> E: mozldap invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libprldap-5.0.so.5.17 libprldap50.so
> E: mozldap invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libldap-5.0.so.5.17 libldap50.so

Where do /usr/lib64/libssldap-5.0.so.5.17 and the others come from?  All of my
lib names should begin with lib[ss,pr]ldap50


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.