[Bug 198882] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-IRC


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882





------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de  2006-07-22 00:44 EST -------
(In reply to comment #13)
> Now I'm really confused.  He's currently using exactly what you told him to use
Does he? 

It's not how I read
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198882#11

> (modulo one underscore, which is probably a typo) and you're still complaining.

The "__" is what makes the difference.

_with_xxx defines are automatically/implicitly set by --with xxx

__with_xxx is a custom define.



>  So what are you proposing that he use now?
MUST: _with_xxx 

This implies supporting --with and renders all the custom 
"--define '__with_xxx 1' superflous.

May-be the problem is understanding the meaning of --with/--without.

Basically all --with/--without does, is to implicitly 
%define _with_xxx 1
rsp.
%define _without_xxx 1

i.e. the "_with" (one underscore) vs. "__with" (two underscores) is the
essential point here.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.