[Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jun 26 05:35:52 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: bitlbee
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591
panemade at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |panemade at gmail.com
------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2006-06-26 01:27 EST -------
Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored
Mock build for development i386 is successfull with some warnings as
warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
MUST Items:
- MUST: rpmlint shows error
E: bitlbee configure-without-libdir-spec
A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure
options must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir}.
- MUST: dist tag is present
- MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
- MUST: The spec file name matching the base package bitlbee, in the
format bitlbee.spec
- MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL.
- MUST: The License field in the package bitlbee.spec file matches the
actual license file COPYING in tarball.
- MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct.
- MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates.
- MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
- MUST: This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
- MUST: This package used macros.
- MUST: Document files are included like INSTALL README.
- MUST: This Package include a bitlbee.desktop file, and that file is
installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section successfully.
- MUST: Package is calling ldconfig on postun post successfully.
* Source URL is present.
* BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot:
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
* BuildRequires is correct
What You Need to Do:-
* Add --libdir=%{_libdir) to %configure
* Add subpackage -doc as document files are more in base package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list