[Bug 189374] Re-Review Request: jed: an editor

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jun 2 18:05:08 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Re-Review Request: jed: an editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189374


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-06-02 13:57 EST -------
Just did a quick mock build (development, x86_64).  rpmlint is unhappy:

W: jed prereq-use /sbin/install-info

I see the Prereq: but I don't see any calls to install-info.  The scriptlets at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets?highlight=%28scriptlets%29#head-117e9450bc166ceb4251bf8d87a9dd4e862442a4
should be used to install info pages; Prereq: should not be used in any case;
Requires(pre): is preferred.

W: jed buildprereq-use slang-devel >= 2.0, autoconf, libselinux-devel

BuildRequires: should be used instead.

E: jed broken-syntax-in-scriptlet-requires BuildPrereq: slang-devel >= 2.0,
autoconf, libselinux-devel

Not sure what's up here; it will probably go away when you switch to BuildRequires:

W: jed hardcoded-path-in-buildroot-tag /var/tmp/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root

Please use %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
as the buildroot.

W: jed patch-not-applied Patch3: jed-multilib.patch

I assume you have reasons for not applying patch3.

E: jed obsolete-not-provided jed-common
E: jed obsolete-not-provided jed-xjed

You should provide these so that upgrades work and so that any packages which
might depend on them don't break.

E: jed binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/jed ['/usr/lib64']

rpath is bad and should be removed if at all possible.  I'll dig into this
further if necessary.

W: jed doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/jed-0.99.18/doc/tm/rtl/tm-sort.sl
/usr/bin/env
W: jed doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/jed-0.99.18/doc/tm/rtl/whatelse.sl
/usr/bin/env

Documentation should not be executable.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list