[Bug 189375] Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Jun 3 02:14:33 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Re-Review Request: Maelstrom: space combat game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189375
------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2006-06-02 22:06 EST -------
> E: Maelstrom standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/icons
>
> - Change the %files line to %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/*
>
> W: Maelstrom buildprereq-use SDL-devel, SDL_net-devel
> E: Maelstrom broken-syntax-in-scriptlet-requires BuildPrereq: SDL-devel,
> SDL_net-devel
>
> - Change BuildPrereq: to BuildRequires:
Both fixed.
> MUSTFIX
> =======
> * See rpmlint notes above
> * BR: SDL-devel is redundant. It's picked up by SDL_net-devel
> * License is GPL, not LGPL
> * License file is included in upstream tarball, but not in %doc
> * Makefile and Makefile.in should not be included in
> /usr/share/Maelstrom/Images or %{_docdir}/Docs
All fixed.
> * There is a questionable clause in the COPYING file:
> "The artwork and sounds used by Maelstrom are copyright Ambrosia Software
> (http://www.ambrosiasw.com) and may not be redistributed separately from
> the Maelstrom public GPL release."
Upstream queried.
> SHOULD
> ======
> * The following is a nice shell trick, but would be more readable if each
> file were removed individually, one per line.
>
> rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/{Maelstrom-netd,macres,playwave,snd2wav}
>
> ...change to...
>
> rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/Maelstrom-netd
> rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/macres
> (and so on)
Awwww. Don't ever read the filesystem spec file. :)
> * The BuildRoot tag is almost there. From
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines:
> %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
Fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list