[Bug 194011] Review Request: curry - Münster Curry compiler

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: curry -  Münster Curry compiler


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194011


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-06-10 14:41 EST -------
Hmmm.  You shouldn't use PreReq:; use Requires: instead.  This solves the following:

W: curry prereq-use curry = %{version}-%{release}

Other than that I'm happy with the package.  An additional couple of ignorable
rpmlint warnings popped up for the -debugger package:

W: curry-debugger no-documentation
W: curry-debugger devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/curry/libcurry_g.a

but these are no big deal.

Review:
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  License text included in package.
* source files match upstream:
   ae56a087dd6e174cc865e701657876a0  curry-0.9.10.tar.gz
   ae56a087dd6e174cc865e701657876a0  curry-0.9.10.tar.gz-srpm
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
O rpmlint has some ignorable complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:
  curry-0.9.10-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm
   curry = 0.9.10-2.fc6
  =
   /bin/sh
   gcc
   libgmp.so.3()(64bit)

  curry-debugger-0.9.10-2.fc6.x86_64.rpm
   curry-debugger = 0.9.10-2.fc6
  =
   curry = 0.9.10-2.fc6

* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
O plenty of headers, but this is a compiler.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
O static libraries, but this is a compiler and there's no reasonable way to
eliminate them.
* not a GUI app.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.