[Bug 195585] Review Request: tetex-fonts-hebrew

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tetex-fonts-hebrew


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195585


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |panemade at gmail.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2006-06-18 07:26 EST -------
Review for this package:-
         Mock build for i386 gives no error
MUST Items:
     - MUST: rpmlint shows no error 
     - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
     - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package tetex-fonts-hebrew, in
the format tetex-fonts-hebrew.spec
      - MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
      - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL.
      - MUST: The License field GPL, in the package tetex-fonts-hebrew.spec file
is NOT included under %doc section as well NOT in tarball.
      - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct.
      - MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates. 
      - MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
      - MUST: This package have a %clean section, which contains %{__rm} -rf
%{buildroot}.
      - MUST: This package used macros.
      - MUST: Document files are NOT included like README.

SHOULD Items:
      - SHOULD: Package should include License file in upstream package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.