[Bug 193712] Review Request: sos

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: sos


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193712





------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2006-06-19 05:54 EST -------
Review for this package:-
      Mock Build Results for i386 
      - Successfully built for i386  
MUST Items:
     - MUST: rpmlint shows no error 
     - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
     - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package sos, in the format
sos.spec
      - MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
      - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL.
      - MUST: The License field in the package sos.spec file NOT included in
tarball.
      - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct.
      - MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates. 
      - MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
      - MUST: This package  have a %clean section, which contains %{__rm} rm -rf
${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}.
      - MUST: This package used macros.
      - MUST: Document files are included like README.
    
 Also,     
       * This package also followed optimized .pyo files installation successfully.
       * You have followed Python Packaging Guidelines for installing module in
pythin_sitelib also.

What you need to do is INCLUDE 
       -LICENSE file
       -Source tarball URL
       * UPDATE tarball and SPEC file and reupload your package.        

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.