[Bug 196591] Review Request: bitlbee

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jun 26 11:16:17 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: bitlbee


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591





------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de  2006-06-26 07:07 EST -------
The gcc warnings because of dereferencing type-punned pointer have to be handled 
by upstream and IIRC they are even OpenSSL not BitlBee related. Most Extras and 
Core packages are having such warnings, because the world is using older gccs.

To your first point at the todo list: No, no - never, sorry. You didn't look 
into the tarball neither you called ./configure --help by hand. Finally a `grep 
-ri libdir bitlbee-1.0.3` returns nothing. For me there is no reason only to 
make rpmlint happy by applying unneccessary and even unused parameters.

To your second point at the todo list: I can't aggree with you when reading the 
Fedora (Extras) Packaging Guidelines. There is neither "a lot of documentation" 
nor is runtime (when installing/updating/erasing) affected by handling exactly 
16 files consuming maximal 150 KB of space.

Waiting for another opinion before changing anything. XML documentation could
be skipped as there is very less similar in /usr/share/doc/*/ of my system. 
Doing this would reduce %{_docdir} to 100 KB which would just host AUTHORS, 
CHANGES, COPYING, CREDITS, FAQ, README and user-guide.txt. On the other hand, I 
can't absolutely see why such basic files (except the 35 KB of user-guide.txt) 
should be moved into a -doc subpackage...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list