[Bug 181831] Review Request: bitbake - Build Tool

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: bitbake - Build Tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181831


bugzilla at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          QAContact|fedora-extras-              |fedora-package-
                   |list at redhat.com             |review at redhat.com

jpmahowald at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com  2006-05-01 12:22 EST -------
- rpmlint checks return:
E: bitbake non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/build.py 0644
E: bitbake non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/parse/parse_py/BBHandler.py 0644
E: bitbake non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/fetch/local.py 0644
E: bitbake non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/data.py 0644
E: bitbake non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/fetch/cvs.py 0644
E: bitbake non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/fetch/svn.py 0644
E: bitbake non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/event.py 0644
E: bitbake non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/fetch/wget.py 0644
E: bitbake non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/parse/parse_py/ConfHandler.py 0644
E: bitbake non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/fetch/__init__.py 0644
E: bitbake non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/cache.py 0644
E: bitbake non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/parse/parse_py/__init__.py 0644
E: bitbake non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/__init__.py
0644
E: bitbake non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/fetch/git.py 0644
E: bitbake non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/shell.py 0644
E: bitbake non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bb/fetch/svk.py 0644

Which are ignorable.


- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime

Building html, xhtml, text, and pdf docs seems a bit redundant. You can drop
html if you like.

- no need for .desktop file 

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.