[Bug 177818] Review Request: adplug
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun May 14 20:50:10 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: adplug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177818
jpmahowald at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |jpmahowald at gmail.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2006-05-14 16:49 EST -------
- rpmlint checks return:
E: adplug binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/adplugdb ['/usr/lib64']
try passing --disable-rpath to configure
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (LGPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on FC5 (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
- devel package ok
- no .la files
- post/postun ldconfig ok
- devel requires base package n-v-r
- db in /var/lib/adplug
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list