[Bug 191624] Review Request: perl-Test-Expect - Automated driving and testing of terminal-based programs

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Expect - Automated driving and testing of terminal-based programs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191624


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-05-16 20:05 EST -------
Module::Build is still having trouble in development; I'll review this on FC5. 
(We really should try to help Steve with that.)

* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  It's not included separately in the
package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it.
* source files match upstream:
   b22cb4575d910bb2d36e506a958da300  Test-Expect-0.30.tar.gz
   b22cb4575d910bb2d36e506a958da300  Test-Expect-0.30.tar.gz-srpm
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (FC5, x86_64), with perl-Expect and perl-Expect-Simple
added.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane.
* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* %check is present and all tests pass:
   All tests successful.
   Files=1, Tests=18,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.08 cusr +  0.04 csys =  0.12 CPU)
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.

APPROVED, but note that you won't be able to build on the development branch
until the Module::Build problem gets worked out.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.