[Bug 192119] Review Request: tuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: tuxkart - Kids 3D go-kart racing game featuring Tux


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192119





------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl  2006-05-18 14:44 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Unfortunately tuxkart includes images that (in some cases might, in others
> clearly) violate trademarks and/or copyright:
> 
> images/adverts.rgb: SuSE, Slashdot, Philips, TuxRacer, SourceForge, VA Linux
> logos, I guess "plib" could be considered safe ;-)
Yes you're correct, good catch. That one needs replacing I'll whip up something
new using ok to use logo's like tux and erm tux?

> images/egypt.rgb: looks like scanned Egyptian drawings

Dunno whats the source, but I dare sayt hat the copyright on these has expired,
even with the disney copyright extension in place.

> images/geeko_icon.rgb, images/players.rgb: resembles SUSE's geeko mascot, don't
> know whether this is trademarked

Erm, it resembles a lizzard yes, afaik having images that resemble an animal
isn't illegal.

> images/lunchbox.rgb: something that looks like a Barbie doll;
Yes it looks like a dress up doll, there are many dress up dolls both with a
thin and a thick figure as long as it doesn't say "Barbie" on it or really is a
clear picture of one I think this is ok.

> images/lunchbox2.rgb: a Pokemon screenshot(?!)
Yes, thats a problem. I'll search for a suitable replacement.

> images/mnm.rgb: a scanned M&M wrap
Yes, thats a problem again. I'll search for a suitable replacement.

> 
> this issue should be resolved IMO for instance by replacing the images
> (preferrably upstream).
For adverts.rgb, lunchbox2.rgb and mnm.rgb I'll search for some replacements,
the other are IMHO not really an issue.

I dunno if upstream is alive, but I will replace them, should I make a new
source tarball or is it enough to just not put them in the RPM's (leaving them
in the SRPM) ?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.