[Bug 192502] Review Request: lilypond-doc - HTML documentation for lilypond

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat May 20 15:34:24 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: lilypond-doc - HTML documentation for lilypond


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192502


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |tibbs at math.uh.edu
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-05-20 11:34 EST -------
Since this is just a doc package, a quick review should suffice:

* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* source files match upstream:
   45622b94aba72994277d6a0d4fcf706c  lilypond-2.8.3-1.documentation.tar.bz2
   45622b94aba72994277d6a0d4fcf706c  lilypond-2.8.3-1.documentation.tar.bz2-srpm
* latest version is being packaged.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* rpmlint is silent.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.

Note: code-not-content rule does not apply as this is merely documentation for a
package already in extras, placed in a separate package so that it can be
non-arch-specific.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list