[Bug 193059] Review Request: ibmasm

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ibmasm


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193059


cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu




------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu  2006-05-26 00:49 EST -------
Not a review, but a couple thoughts -- which I'll preface by saying I'd love to
see this one in extras <grin>:

* As this isn't a kernel or a kernel module, a group of "Applications/System" is
probably more appropriate than "System Environment/Kernel"

* I'm pretty sure the license isn't GPL, as, e.g., ibmasm/src/rsa.h states:
"This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the Lesser
GNU Public License, incorporated herein by reference".

* A full upstream source URL is required, such that the code tarball can be
fetched independently.

* With respect to "ExclusiveArch: i386", why exclude x86_64?  Is this documented
somewhere?

---

On a different level, why not make this a public bug?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.