[Bug 191014] Review Request: ganymed
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri May 26 17:19:22 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ganymed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191014
------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2006-05-26 13:11 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > (In reply to comment #1)
> >
> > > * Why have all those macro definitions, conditional and otherwise, at the top
> > > instead of just...
> > > %define gcj_support 1
> > > ?
> >
> > umm Ben Konrath added that part to my initial SPEC, I just thougth it was just
> > to make easy to package it for RHEL
>
> I just copied what our other eclipse packages do. Andrew, do you have any
> thoughts here?
Yeah, I added that stuff so that we could do the gcj_support conditionally but
also for other RHEL-specific stuff. Outside of the Eclipse SDK we probably
don't need it, though. gcj_support itself should be enough. Sorry.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list