[Bug 190090] Review Request: <ocrad>
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun May 28 19:42:00 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: <ocrad>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190090
ed at eh3.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Review Request: <ocrad> |Review Request: <ocrad>
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |ed at eh3.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2006-05-28 15:34 EST -------
Hi Krzysztof, here are a few items. Its not a complete review, its just
what I could look at in the free time I had today:
good:
+ source matches upstream
+ license is OK
+ no warnings or errors from rpmlint
+ no *.la files
+ no shared libs
+ appears to have propoer handling of info files
needswork:
- the license file should be included in %doc
- the INSTALL file should not be in %doc
- unfortunately, the buildsystem (configure && make) for ocrad is
very minimal (its not based upon the Gnu autotools) and does
not honor ${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}. Please patch Makefile.in so that
you can use something like:
export CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS"
make
in the spec-file
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list