[Bug 190090] Review Request: <ocrad>

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun May 28 19:42:00 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: <ocrad>


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190090


ed at eh3.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request: <ocrad>     |Review Request: <ocrad>
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |ed at eh3.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com  2006-05-28 15:34 EST -------
Hi Krzysztof, here are a few items.  Its not a complete review, its just 
what I could look at in the free time I had today:

good:
 + source matches upstream
 + license is OK 
 + no warnings or errors from rpmlint
 + no *.la files
 + no shared libs
 + appears to have propoer handling of info files

needswork:
 - the license file should be included in %doc
 - the INSTALL file should not be in %doc
 - unfortunately, the buildsystem (configure && make) for ocrad is 
     very minimal (its not based upon the Gnu autotools) and does 
     not honor ${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}.  Please patch Makefile.in so that 
     you can use something like:

        export CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS"
        make

     in the spec-file

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list