[Bug 182254] Review Request: SS5

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed May 31 23:42:02 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: SS5


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182254


jpmahowald at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com  2006-05-31 19:34 EST -------
Using ss5-3.5.9-1.src.rpm

- rpmlint checks return:
E: ss5 configure-without-libdir-spec
A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure
options must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir}.

Built fine, however, with the --with-libpath option. I say ignore.

W: ss5 no-version-in-last-changelog
The last changelog entry doesn't contain a version. Please insert the
version that is coherent with the version of the package and rebuild it.

Next release add the version-release to the changelog, right after your email

W: ss5 log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/ss5
This package contains files in /var/log/ without adding logrotate
configuration for them.

logrotate not critical, but may want to consider adding in the future.

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file

APPROVED

Do you need a sponsor? I'll be yours if necessary, apply for cvsextras.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list