[Bug 197754] Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl6-Bible


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197754


steve at silug.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER           |ASSIGNED




------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org  2006-11-02 20:25 EST -------
Apparently my first mail was incorrectly addressed, and gmail's spam filter 
ate the second one, but TPF President Bill Odom eventually noticed it and gave 
me this answer:

Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 09:13:01 -0600
From: "Bill Odom" <billodom at gmail.com>
To: "Steven Pritchard" <steve at kspei.com>
Subject: Re: documentation license question
In-Reply-To: <f695806b0610291450v231e8a90yc468423107a54cfd at mail.gmail.com>

Steve:

Okay, here's the definitive word from Allison, who's been immersed in
the legal and licensing side for far longer than any one person should
ever have to be:

On 10/31/06, Allison Randal <allison at perl.org> wrote:
>The Perl 6 Bible is the Apocalypses, Exegeses, and Synopses.
...
>They'll be under the same terms as the production release of Perl 6,
>which is:
>  - they are covered by the author's contributor agreement to TPF
>  - the compilation copyright is owned by TPF
>  - authors retain their individual copyright in individual pieces
>  - Artistic 2.0 license

Does that give you what you need, or should I do some more digging?

Thanks,
Bill

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.