[Bug 213600] Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Nov 10 16:48:54 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: tinyca2 - Simple graphical userinterface to manage a small CA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213600
mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-10 11:48 EST -------
NOTE:
* would you consider using braces {} for using macro? I think
using braces should make spec file easier to read......
Well,
1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines :
* License
- (NOT A BLOCKER) original tarball does not include the copy of
GPL license. You should ask upstream to include GPL copy.
* Desktop files
- For desktop-file-install, the line
"--add-category X-Fedora" should be removed as
* this is of no use any longer.
* original desktop-file-utils 0.11 refuses this (although Fedora
patched against this to only warn against this).
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/DesktopFiles
2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
= Nothing
3. Other things I have noticed :
* desktop file
- (NOT A BROCKER) I strongly recommend that you install a
icon which can be used for desktop entry and write to
the spec file where (or how) we can get the icon. However,
for a quick look I cannot find a proper icon from
http://tinyca.sm-zone.net/ ....
Would you ask upstream to provide a icon?
Consider the comments above. However I can approve this
package now.
----------------------------------------------------------
This package (tinyca2) is APPROVED by me.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list