[Bug 215256] Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: firefox-32 - Alternate Launcher for 32bit Firefox


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215256





------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com  2006-11-13 08:58 EST -------
> Why include Sources as Patches?

So it can be tracked in VCS instead of the binary cache.

> If there is no way to require the 32bit package from this "wrapper", then the
> package seems pretty broken, no? Would "Requires: /usr/lib/mozilla" work?

You might be correct, however Bug #214100 is the real reasonable thing to do. 
Given that has been rejected this package is our only solution until
nspluginwrapper is made perfect.

> Oh, and Matthias Saou thinks it's pretty weird to address one's self using the
> 3rd person :-)

That part is actually in the package %description.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.