[Bug 212917] Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject - An SQL Builder, Object Interface to Database Tables

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB-DataObject - An SQL Builder, Object Interface to Database Tables
Alias: DB-DataObject

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212917





------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-11-15 13:45 EST -------
Something's odd with the changelog entry; it shows version 1.0.0-0.1.RC5 but the
package version is 1.8.4.  This causes an rpmlint complaint:
W: php-pear-DB-DataObject incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.0-0.1.RC5 1.8.4-1.fc7

There's also this:

E: php-pear-DB-DataObject non-executable-script
/usr/share/pear/DB/DataObject/createTables.php 0644

I think this is actually an end-user executable.  Should it really be buried
under /usr/share, or should it be in /usr/bin?

* source files match upstream:
   770c44d243066340d639b063235dcc02  DB_DataObject-1.8.4.tgz
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
X The spec is fine except for the changelog.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  License text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
X rpmlint has valid complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   php-pear(DB_DataObject) = 1.8.4
   php-pear-DB-DataObject = 1.8.4-1.fc7
  =
   /bin/sh
   /usr/bin/pear
   php-pear(DB)
   php-pear(Date)
   php-pear(MDB2)
   php-pear(PEAR)
   php-pear(Validate)
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
? not sure about file permissions.
* scriptlets are OK (pear module installation).
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.