[Bug 215563] Review Request: aquamarine - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: aquamarine - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215563





------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com  2006-11-16 18:36 EST -------
Only place I'm seeing anything about the license is currently in the source code
itself (src/aquamarine.cpp):

/*
 *  Aquamarine the KDE window decorator
 *
 *  Copyright (c) 2006 Dennis Kasprzyk <onestone at beryl-project.org>
 *  Copyright (c) 2006 Volker Krause <vkrause at kde.org>
 *
 *  Uses code of:
 *      Emerald window decorator (www.beryl-project.org)
 *      KWin window manager (www.kde.org)
 *
 *  This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
 *  it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
 *  the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
 *  (at your option) any later version.
 *
 *  This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 *  but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 *  MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
 *  GNU General Public License for more details.
 *
 *  You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
 *  along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
 *  Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA.
 *
 */

So it *is* GPL, they just haven't got around to putting evidence of that
somewhere sensible yet. :)

Also, there's a new build that has trimmed down BR (needs beryl-core-devel >=
0.1.2-5):

http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/aquamarine-0.1.2-2.fc6.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.