[Bug 216300] Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Nov 20 04:15:10 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: chemtool - A program for 2D drawing organic molecules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216300
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-19 23:15 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=141615)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=141615&action=view)
rpmbuild build log of chemtool 1.6.9-3.fc7
This time mockbuild succeeds, however, rpmbuild fails.
>From configure and your spec file (1.6.9-3), it seems that
if the directory /usr/share/mimelnk or /usr/share/mime-info
exists, 'make install' tries to install some extra files.
Check your configure option
--------------------------------------
--with-kdedir=%{_prefix} \
--with-gnomedir=%{_prefix}
-------------------------------------- ,
around the line 4534-4581 of configure, and the build log by
rpmbuild attached.
Currently /usr/share/mimelnk are owned by kdelibs and OOo-core
(OOo=openoffice.org), /usr/share/mime-info is owned by OOo-core.
So if one of these rpms is installed, rpmbuild fails.
(Note: /usr/share/mime-info is not owned by gnome-mime-data, however
some files under /usr/share/mime-info are owned by gnome-mime-data)
You can fix this by either the following.
* BuildRequire kdelibs and gnome-mime-data (or OOo-core!)
and fix your spec file
so that extra files installed by 'make install' are correctly
removed
* Use 'rm -f' against possibly installed extra files (not 'rm')
I think this is the best idea.
* Pass the directory which does not exist to configure option.
i.e. --with-kdedir=the_directory_which_does_not_seem_to_exist .
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list