[Bug 198244] Review Request: libglade
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Oct 2 02:37:01 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libglade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198244
tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2006-10-01 22:36 EST -------
So, really it's just the undefined-non-weak-symbol thing. I'll go ahead and
approve, but it would be good to at least check if it's possible to fix that.
* source files match upstream:
38b2e2cfd813783fe157617813bfe3b3 libglade-0.17.tar.gz
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible. License text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged (the latest version before glade2, that is)
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* debuginfo package looks complete.
? rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
libglade-0.17-17.fc6.x86_64.rpm
libglade-gnome.so.0()(64bit)
libglade.so.0()(64bit)
libglade = 1:0.17-17.fc6
=
/sbin/ldconfig
libICE.so.6()(64bit)
libSM.so.6()(64bit)
libX11.so.6()(64bit)
libXext.so.6()(64bit)
libXi.so.6()(64bit)
libart_lgpl.so.2()(64bit)
libaudiofile.so.0()(64bit)
libesd.so.0()(64bit)
libgdk-1.2.so.0()(64bit)
libgdk_imlib.so.1()(64bit)
libglade-gnome.so.0()(64bit)
libglade.so.0()(64bit)
libglib-1.2.so.0()(64bit)
libgmodule-1.2.so.0()(64bit)
libgnome.so.32()(64bit)
libgnomesupport.so.0()(64bit)
libgnomeui.so.32()(64bit)
libgtk-1.2.so.0()(64bit)
libxml.so.1()(64bit)
libglade-devel-0.17-17.fc6.x86_64.rpm
libglade-devel = 1:0.17-17.fc6
=
/bin/sh
/usr/bin/env
gnome-libs-devel >= 1.4.1.2
libglade = 1:0.17-17.fc6
libglade-gnome.so.0()(64bit)
libglade.so.0()(64bit)
libxml-devel >= 1.8.16
pkgconfig
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.
* shared libraries present; ldconfig is called as necessary. Unversioned .so
files are in the -devel subpackage.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* scriptlets are OK (ldconfig)
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* headers in -devel subpackage.
* pkgconfig file in -devel subpackage; pkgconfig is a dependency.
* no libtool .la droppings.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list