[Bug 198244] Review Request: libglade

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Oct 2 11:44:31 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libglade


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198244





------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org  2006-10-02 07:44 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> This builds in mock; rpmlint complains about the following:
>    E: libglade-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
> I think this is due to /usr/lib64/libgladeConf.sh.  A couple of other packages
> (libxml2-devel, libxslt-devel) do this.  I guess it's some pre-pkgconfig
> behavior or something.  It's pretty bogus, but I don't think it's a blocker for
> a legacy library like this one.

OK, left that one.

> Additionally, rpmlint on the installed package complains:
> 
> W: libglade undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libglade-gnome.so.0.4.2
> glade_standard_build_children
> 
> plus 17 additional undefined-non-weak-symbol warnings.  I guess it would be nice
> for these to go away, but again, this is a legacy library and these aren't
> generally blockers in any case.

I believe I've fixed this in -19, along with the /usr/lib64 rpaths on the x86_64
build.

Given that you approved the package already, I'll import it and build it. Any
new issues you have, I'll fix in cvs.

Thanks for the review.

Spec URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/libglade.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/Gnome-1/libglade-0.17-19.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list