[Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Oct 2 23:56:43 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922





------- Additional Comments From dwmw2 at redhat.com  2006-10-02 19:56 EST -------
Looking at the spandsp review bug, it seems I was wrong -- we can put spandsp in.

I've also been looking at OpenPBX, which is apparently due for release soon.
I'm not particularly impressed by their political reasons for forking Asterisk,
but they have a codebase which:
 - Uses POSIX timers instead of ztdummy
 - Contains app_conference, again not requiring zaptel
 - Contains chan_bluetooth

I wonder if OpenPBX would be a better choice for packaging in Extras, if Digium
refuse to put their kernel modules upstream and refuse to remove the most
gratuitous dependencies on them.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list