[Bug 208737] Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Oct 3 05:11:19 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ivman - Generic handler for HAL events
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208737
kevin at tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-10-03 01:11 EST -------
OK - Package name
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (QPL/GPL)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
031c763d6acc927bf2fefd7c6140247d ivman-0.6.12.tar.bz2
031c763d6acc927bf2fefd7c6140247d ivman-0.6.12.tar.bz2.1
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
See below - No rpmlint output.
SHOULD Items:
- Should include License or ask upstream to include it.
- Should build in mock.
Issues:
1. rpmlint says:
W: ivman incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/ivman $servicename
W: ivman incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/ivman $servicename
W: ivman incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/ivman $servicename
I think this is rpmlint getting confused. The pid file looks
correct to me. You might doublecheck it.
2. I take it this is targeted for fc6?
dbus-glib-devel doesn't exist in fc5.
Everything else looks good... this package is APPROVED.
Don't forget to close this NEXTRELEASE once it's been imported and built.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list