[Bug 201000] Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Oct 13 18:16:07 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201000


rpm at greysector.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net  2006-10-13 14:16 EST -------
(In reply to comment #12)
> I'm not sure what impact this would have on other dependent projects, and it's
> for fixing something that (currently) isn't broke.

IMHO this is avoiding future trouble.

> I also consulted the packaging commitee and most agree on that (but we were
> only 5 out of 10 present).

3/10 is hardly a majority.

> I suggest the following: Let the package pass as is (at least wrt to headers,
> if the are other issues, they need to be fixed, of course), and I will take
> the header topic upstream. So should a clash with say glibc's assumed future
> extensions folder come up, the issue would have been ironed out at the source
> and not the package. Do you agree?

No, I don't, but I'm not going to hold this up. If anyone has some issues later,
I'll tell them to take it up with you four.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list