[Bug 211242] Review Request: scribes-templates - Templates ("Snippets") for the Scribes text editor

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: scribes-templates - Templates ("Snippets") for the Scribes text editor


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211242


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2006-10-19 12:19 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)

>  Why are datestamps like this not
> preferred? (There really is no other specific versioning to it...)

There are many cases that a source numbered by date means it is a pre-version
and in that case the VERSION in spec file should have something like
0.%{date}. However, if it is not for this package, it is okay.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
   This package (scribes-templates) is APPROVED by me.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.