[Bug 210007] Review Request: <libtune> - <standard API to access the kernel tunables>

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: <libtune> - <standard API to access the kernel tunables>


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210007





------- Additional Comments From Nadia.Derbey at bull.net  2006-10-20 06:14 EST -------
(In reply to comment #6)

> > > 4).
> > > %{_libdir}/libtune.la
> > > %{_libdir}/libtune.so.0
> > > %{_libdir}/libtune.so.0.0.0
> > > 
> > > you can glob them using the *
> > > 
> > 
> > Doing this I would get libtune.a and libtune.so too, while these 2 files have
> > to go in the -devel package. Am I wrong?
> > 
> 
> Before I address your question, I just realized that the version of the libtune
> libariries is 0.0.0. Should it be 0.10.1 ?
> 

I thought library version number shouldn't necessarily be the same as the
project one? (see http://sources.redhat.com/autobook/autobook/autobook_91.html)

I'd rather say it should be 0.10.0



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.