[Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Oct 21 17:25:48 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-10-21 13:25 EST -------
(In reply to comment #17)
> (In reply to comment #14)
>
> > profile files and desktop files are useless for tideEditor because:
> > * HFILE_PATH should be under wher user has write access (For example,
> > HFILE_PATH=/usr/share/xtide/harminocs-????.tcd tideEditor
> > immediately exits).
> > * tideEditor surely requires HFILE_PATH environ. With no HFILE_PATH
> > environ, this cannot be launched.
>
> Hrm. A wrapper which sets HFILE_PATH to the argument would be
> better. And even better a file choser for tideEditor when no
> HFILE_PATH and no arg is set.
copy tcd file to /tmp when invoked (with no arg specified)?
Some wrapper script to change ENV to arg as you said is preferable anyway.
Well, is there a way to pass a argument (in general) to binary
when called by desktop files (icon in panel)?
>
>
> > Well, when I directly use release number, i.e.
> > tcd-utils: 1.3.7-1 2 3 4 5 ...
> > xtide versioning become
> > 2.9-dev 0.1.dev 0.2.dev.. 0.3.dev.. 0.4.dev..
> > (then formal release) 5 (suddenly jump)
>
> Why 5? Why not 1? The version/release of tcd-utils is not linked
> in a very precise way to xtide verson/release? I even hope that
> some day they are split.
Well, xtide<->tcd-utils versioning splitting is allowed, there is
no problem.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list