[Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Oct 22 02:51:17 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2006-10-21 22:51 EST -------
Thank you for checking.
Well..

(In reply to comment #20)
> * I also propose to standardize the libtcd building such that
> it can be done with
> 
> export CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -DCOMPAT114"
> %configure
> %{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} \
> %if %{build_libtcd}
>    libtcd.so \
>    SOMAJOR=`echo %{libtcd_soname} | sed -e 's|^\(.*\)\.\(.*\)\.\(.*\)$|\1|'` \
>    SOMINOR=`echo %{libtcd_soname} | sed -e 's|^\(.*\)\.\(.*\)\.\(.*\)$|\2|'` \
>    SOVER=`  echo %{libtcd_soname} | sed -e 's|^\(.*\)\.\(.*\)\.\(.*\)$|\3|'`
> %endif
> 
> I attach the updated libtcd-2.3.1-shared.patch.
Okay, I will recheck CFLAGS issue again.

> 
> 
> * Now there is the issue of missing dependency of tideEditor and xttpd which 
> requires /etc/xtide.conf and /usr/share/xtide/harmonics-2004-06-14.tcd.
> To workaround this issue I propose to add a package which will 
> contain those common datas, called, for example tcd-utils-data and
> which will contain .......

I think that "xtide-data" is more preferable and I will introduce
this.

> * There is a strange $f on the following line
> %{__install} -c -p -m755 libtcd.so.*.*.* $f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}

!? Oops.... I will correct this.

> * In my opinion /etc/xttpd.conf should be instead /etc/sysconfig/xttpd,
> with the corresponding adjustment of xttpd.init

Okay.

(In reply to comment #21) 
> The patch is for tideEditor-wrapper.sh

Oh, good catch. I will apply.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list