[Bug 202853] Review Request: wfut - WorldForge media updater tool

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: wfut - WorldForge media updater tool
Alias: wfut

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202853


chris.stone at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2006-09-03 21:27 EST -------
- rpmlint output clean
- package named according to package naming guildelines
- spec file name matches %{name}
- package meets packaging guidelines
- licensed with open source compatible license
- license matches actual license
- license file included in %doc
- spec file written in American english
- spec file is legible
- sources match upstream
23d40558c121d5c52917846a36d48b80  WFUT-1.0-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz
- compiles and builds on fc5 x86_64
- all build dependencies listed in build requires
- package does not use locales
- package does not contain shared libraries
- package is not relocatable
- package owns all directories it creates
- no duplicates in %files
- permissions on files set properly
- contains proper %clean section
- macro usage is consistent
- package contains permissible content
- no large documentation
- %doc files do not affect runtime
- no header files or static libraries
- no pkgconfig files
- no library files
- no devel package
- no .la files
- package is a GUI application and contains proper desktop files
- package does not own files or directories owned by other packages


I can't find anything wrong with this spec file.  Approved.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.