[Bug 205884] Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - Check validity of internet email address

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Valid - Check validity of internet email address


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205884


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-09-15 14:03 EST -------
I grabbed a copy of the SRPM from:
http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/aurora/scratch/spot-review/perl-Email-Valid-0.176-1.src.rpm

and updated it with the above attached specfile.  The result looks better.

rpmlint says:
  W: perl-Email-Valid mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs
  (no big deal; the errant tab is on the BuildRequireas: bind-utils line if you
want to remove it).

The only real issue I see is that you manually specify Requires:
perl(Mail::Address) which is duplicated by RPM's automatic dependency generation
and thus should be removed.

Some tests are skipped; running with TEST_VERBOSE=1 shows this:
   ok 12 # skip your dns appears missing or failing to resolve
   ok 13 # skip your dns appears missing or failing to resolve
This is due to building in mock with no DNS config.
   ok 14 # skip tests require Net::Domain::TLD 1.65
   ok 15 # skip tests require Net::Domain::TLD 1.65
   ok 16 # skip tests require Net::Domain::TLD 1.65
Net::Domain::TLD is not in the repo so this is unavoidable at this time.

Review:
* source files match upstream:
   c71a350965c97473af80edfa1bff0b63  Email-Valid-0.176.tar.gz
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  License text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* rpmlint is silent.
X final provides and requires are sane:
   perl(Email::Valid) = 0.176
   perl-Email-Valid = 0.176-2.fc6
  =
   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
   perl(Carp)
   perl(File::Spec)
   perl(IO::File)
   perl(Mail::Address)
X  perl(Mail::Address)
   perl(strict)
   perl(vars)
* %check is present and all tests pass:
        5/16 skipped: various reasons
   All tests successful, 5 subtests skipped.
   Files=3, Tests=18, 36 wallclock secs ( 0.18 cusr +  0.04 csys =  0.22 CPU)
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.