[Bug 208006] Review Request: perl-Time-Period - A Perl module to deal with time periods

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Sep 26 01:41:48 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Period - A Perl module to deal with time periods


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208006


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778                      |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2006-09-25 21:41 EST -------
* source files match upstream:
   63b073af8ec96e7fa48801cd6fcccdd1  Period-1.20.tar.gz
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  License text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper (BR: perl is unnecessary)
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   perl(Time::Period) = 1.20
   perl-Time-Period = 1.20-1.fc6
  =
   perl >= 0:5.001
   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
   perl(Exporter)
* %check is present but the package has no tests to run.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list