[Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Sep 29 08:16:46 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250
mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-29 04:16 EST -------
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #14)
> > The problem is to know if I have to add this BR or if this BR is missing in
> a
> > package from which pikloop depends.
>
> piklab of course :-)
Well, configure requests the existence of -lcurses.
in FC5, this is in ncurses, which are installed by minimal buildroot.
However, in FC6, libcurses.so is moved to ncurses-devel.
So you have to add ncurses-devel to BuildRequires and the problem
for rebuilding is resolved.
I have not yet reviewed this fully, however,
* rpmlint complaints about long summary. It says that summary should
have no longer than 79 characters.
* Please add "ncurses-devel" to BuildRequiers (this should be no problem
for FC5, too).
* Perhaps /etc/security/consoles.perms.d/ should be
/etc/security/console.perms.d/ ? (the latter is owned by pam)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list