[Bug 234571] Review Request: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene - Regular expression-based Perl Parser for NCBI Entrez Gene
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Apr 2 09:51:38 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene - Regular expression-based Perl Parser for NCBI Entrez Gene
Alias: Bio-ASN1-Entrez
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234571
panemade at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-04-02 05:51 EST -------
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream url
fabb888e03435007e08050def1aed0ac Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091.tgz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ make test disabled for circular BR on perl-bioperl
+ Provides: perl(Bio::ASN1::EntrezGene) = 1.09
perl(Bio::ASN1::EntrezGene::Indexer) = 1.09 perl(Bio::ASN1::Sequence) = 1.09
perl(Bio::ASN1::Sequence::Indexer) = 1.09
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list