[Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned CJK bitmap font


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560





------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com  2007-04-02 19:24 EST -------
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-March/msg00128.html

Basically the conclusion was that it should go into the version field
as Tasaka-san suggested.  So either "0.8.0_6" or "0.8.0.6".  It would
really be better though if the "upstream release number" could go away
since it just causes problems for packagers.

(In reply to comment #21)
> oh, yes, if the release number start from 1, then, the version-release number
> in %changelog will not match the package's number. 

They have to match. :)

> perhaps the way you suggested is better.

Well, I would put it more strongly, you cannot use the "upstream release number"
directly in the Fedora release field.  It could be embedded there if you do
not wish to include it in the version field.

See also <http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines>.


Qianqian, as the submitter you cannot assign a Package Review to yourself.
Tasaka-san, do you want to take it?  Otherwise I can do it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.