[Bug 225610] Merge Review: bcel

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Apr 11 14:56:37 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: bcel


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225610





------- Additional Comments From mwringe at redhat.com  2007-04-11 10:56 EST -------
* The examples/Mini README probably shouldn't be marked as a %doc as it makes
more sense to just leave it in the Mini directory.
* The demo package probably shouldn't install things to
%{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version} but to %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/demo
* It seems strange that the demo package doesn't have any documentation
describing what the classes do and how to build them. But I guess the sources
don't have this information either
* The build file for the demo package is the build.xml for the whole project.
Perhaps this should be included in the demo package (or maybe a subset that
would only build the demos?)
* The manual subpackage just has the license file in there, there should be more
to the manual than this. maybe the manual only gets built if using maven?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list