[Bug 230560] Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Apr 22 03:38:08 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: wqy-bitmap-fonts - a fine-tuned Chinese bitmap font


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230560





------- Additional Comments From bbbush.yuan at gmail.com  2007-04-21 23:37 EST -------
Hi,

Just FYI, we had a RPM SPEC for wqy bitmap song font at this URL:
SPEC: ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/fonts-wenquanyi-song.spec
SRPM:
ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/in-review/fonts-wenquanyi-song-0.8.6-0.1.n20070405.fc7.src.rpm

It is for nightly build, and contains a emacs setup file for FC-6 (In FC-7 it
should not be used, #175599). It also contains a font alias file which I think
should be useful.


Here is my review:
* bitmap fonts are always under "misc" directory.
* I like the name fonts-wenquanyi-song-pcf and -ttf since I believe your font
family will become huge in size & variants.
* The font has BDF source so why not use that as Source0, and use bdftopcf to
generate PCF on the fly.
* Summary and %description could be localized
* Requires(pre): /usr/bin/mkfontdir
* Why conflicts?
* Why provides? Why conflicts and provides are not match?
* install -d -m755 on both %{fontdir} and %{fontconfdir}
* %defattr(-, root, root, -) is nicer
* %doc should not contain INSTALL*
* %ghost %verify??
* Don't have to use [ -f .... ] && .... since you have already specified them in
Requires
* Keep old changelogs, and raise spec release number after each round of
review/modification


Thanks!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list