[Bug 226302] Merge Review: pm-utils

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Aug 30 17:30:15 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: pm-utils


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226302


opensource at till.name changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |ASSIGNED
               Flag|needinfo?(pknirsch at redhat.co|
                   |m)                          |




------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name  2007-08-30 13:30 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> 1. Is there no upstream repo for this package?
> Perhaps you could add it to 'hosted.fedoraproject.org' so it has some upstream
> presense?

There is http://webcvs.freedesktop.org/pm-utils/pm-utils/ but I did not yet find
any source for tarballs.

> Also upstream for radeontool and vbetool links would be nice.

I guess for vbetool there is only the directory where the source comes from, for
radeontoll I added something to the spec.
 
> rpmlint on pm-utils-0.19.1-6.fc7.src.rpm
> W: pm-utils no-url-tag
> 
> Would be nice to have upstream.

I added http://pm-utils.freedesktop.org/, where it is planned to add some
information according to the pm-utils mailinglist.

> W: pm-utils unversioned-explicit-obsoletes vbetool
> W: pm-utils unversioned-explicit-provides vbetool
> W: pm-utils unversioned-explicit-obsoletes radeontool
> 
> Would be very nice to provides versions on these if they are split out later.

Would this be better?
Obsoletes: vbetool < 0.7-0
Provides: vbetool = 0.7-0
Obsoletes: radeontool < 1.5-0
Provides: radeontool = 1.5-0

I will look into the other issues later, but it may need some time.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list