[Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Aug 5 15:20:12 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522
------- Additional Comments From kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp 2007-08-05 11:20 EST -------
(In reply to comment #13)
> * Patch0
> --------------------------------------------------
> Patch0: sepostgresql-%{version}-%{release}.patch
> --------------------------------------------------
> - Please don't write in this way. This surely
> fails on F-7 FC-6 (i.e. except for rawhide) because
> release is defined as:
> --------------------------------------------------
> Release: 0.409%{?sepgextension}%{?dist}
> --------------------------------------------------
Is it possible to use an immediate version identifier instead of "${version}-%
{release}", like "Patch0: sepostgresql-0.409.patch" ?
If not so, we cannot identify differenct patches.
> * AutoProv: no
> - Why is this needed?
It got unnecessary in the current version.
I'll remove it.
> * CFLAGS
> --------------------------------------------------
> CFLAGS=`echo $CFLAGS|xargs -n 1|grep -v ffast-math|xargs -n 100`
> --------------------------------------------------
> - This is redundant because Fedora's CFLAGS does not contain
> -ffast-math
It's just a copy from postgresql.spec.
I'll remove it.
> * Macros
> - Please use macros correctly.
> /var -> %_localstatedir
> /usr/sbin -> %_sbindir
The translation of "/usr/sbin -> %_sbindir" also targets /usr/sbin/semodule?
In my understanding, the location of external commands don't have any
relationship with %_prefix of sepostgresql.
I don't have any specific note for the rest of your comments.
I'll fix them. Please wait for updating the specfile.
Thanks,
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list