[Bug 251019] Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Aug 14 17:05:41 UTC 2007


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware lister


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251019





------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no  2007-08-14 13:05 EST -------
> === Issues ===
> 1. I am not sure which license is used by the program. The Copying file mentions
> the GPLv2 or later clauses,which would mean that the correct tag is GPLv2+.
> However I might misinterpretate it, so Lyonel, please assist and let us know
> what is the intended licensing scheme.

GPLv2 is correct, ref:

 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591#c42

> 2. The source URL included was not accesible, the site seemed to be down at the
> moment of the review
> 3. The file named "Changes" references a later version of the source. As the
> site for upstream was not accessible, I could not check

That is a known issue, ref: comment #3 over.
 

> 4. I will verify this a bit later.
> 5. Please use separate files for the pam and desktop files. Creating them in the
> spec is technically OK, but is prone to errors, while using separate files
> allows better time/version/MD5 checking

Fixed.

> 6. (pedantic, feel free to ignore): Please verify if "make" and "make gui" are
> both needed. I cannot test now, but at the first glance I think that "make gui"
> is enough, it will build everything.

You are right, fixed.
 
Updated version:
SPEC: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw.spec
SRPM: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/lshw/lshw-B.02.11.01-3.fc7.src.rpm


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list