[Bug 253691] Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development environments


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253691





------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi  2007-08-21 07:49 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)

Not a full review, just a few observations:

> E: java-1.7.0-icedtea binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0/jre/bin/keytool
> ['$ORIGIN/../lib/i386/jli', '$ORIGIN/../jre/lib/i386/jli']
> 
>   rpmlint should check for $ORIGIN before issuing this message since $ORIGIN
>   rpaths are not hard-coded.

Not all $ORIGIN RPATHs are desirable anyway though.  See
/usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths-worker in >= 4.4.2.1 rpm-build versions (or
rpmdevtools <= 5.4) and/or try building the package with these checks enabled
(see rpmdev-setuptree) to see if it flags them as bad.

> W: java-1.7.0-icedtea uncompressed-zip
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0/jre/lib/jsse.jar
> 
>   This is an rpmlint bug: the jar file is compressed.

Can you upload the binary package or just the jsse.jar which triggers this
message somewhere so I can check what's up?

> E: java-1.7.0-icedtea-demo invalid-soname
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0/demo/jvmti/mtrace/lib/libmtrace.so
> libmtrace.so
> 
>   These files are meant to be dlopen'd, not linked-to directly, so they should
>   not have a versioned soname.

Isn't versioning the very purpose of sonames?  What would a versionless soname
be useful for?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.